AN EXEGESIS OF SCHOLARLY VIEWS ON KARL POPPER’S FALSIFICATIONISM

Abstract

Karl Popper’s falsificationism has been regarded as the cornerstone of Philosophy of Science. As it were, it has been subject to diverse scholarly perspectives. This paper provides an in-depth exegesis of prominent scholarly views on Popper’s falsificationism examining both supportive and critical stances. By means of systematic analysis of key scholars and commentators, this research explores and elucidates the nuances and controversies that greet Popper’s postulations. This exegesis exposes an interesting tapestry of perspectives as well as highlights the debates on demarcation, verification and the role of conjecture in Popper’s Philosophy of Science. By synthesizing these scholarly views, this paper aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the complexities and implications of Popper’s falsificationism. This way, this paper contributes to the perennial discussions in Epistemology and Philosophy of Science